It seems like since the beginning of time, men have taken the front seat on the affairs of the world but men are very egotistic and believe that talking is a waste of time.
Men believe that might is right, they believe "if I can't have it, you mustn't either (even if it was yours to begin with).
Men's view arm wrestling as diplomacy, they keep squeezing the balls of the other guy until they provoke a "reaction" which they then frame as an "action" with the help of government controlled media.
The next step is to take young men to war.
If women are at the helm of affairs, I can almost guarantee world peace. Women would rather negotiate even if it takes months rather than fight.
They would rather share that quarrel when things can be shared.
They seem to know how to manage and manipulate issues better than men.
Women value life more than men do, it's true ! They do the bringing forth of the baby and know the pains involved in rearing a child to adulthood.
I am yet to see a country which has a woman as its prime minister or president engaging in war.
Women do everything possible to avoid and avert war.
Men would rather thump their chests forward shouting "BRING IT ON" well of course, they wouldn't be on the battle field.
Take George Bush for instance, he dodged the draft but was quick to send young men to their deaths when he took office.
I could go on and on about why I support women leading the world but here http://ieet.org/index.php/ieet/more/pellissier20110215 are some views from someone else on the same issue.
The long and short of it is that when women take the lead, world peace can ALMOST be GUARANTEED !.